📰 MIRRORMAIL – Reader Voices: Feb. 1973
- glamslam72

- Feb 17, 1973
- 3 min read
MIRRORMAIL – The Glam Letters: T. Rex, The Sweet & Bowie vs. Strawbs – Feb. 1973
Three explosive glam‑rock fan letters dominate Record Mirror’s MIRRORMAIL page, capturing the passions, rivalries, and loyalties of February 1973.
📰 Key Highlights
• Published in Record Mirror, February 17, 1973
• Three major glam‑rock letters:
– T. Rex on Cilla Black (Louise Quinsell)
– The Sweet defended (Patric Breens)
– Strawbs vs. Bowie (Ziggy Superfan Kid)
• Captures the glam‑rock cultural climate of early 1973
• Additional letters include Jimmy Osmond, BBC changes, LP collections
• Edited by Val Mabbs
📰 Overview
The MIRRORMAIL page from February 17, 1973 is dominated by three fan letters that crystallise the emotional temperature of the glam‑rock era. Marc Bolan, The Sweet, and David Bowie each inspire fierce loyalty — and equally fierce criticism — as fans use the letters page to defend their idols, attack perceived rivals, and articulate the stakes of early‑’70s pop culture.
📰 Source Details
Publication / Venue: Record Mirror
Date: February 17, 1973
Issue / Format: One‑page letters feature
Provenance Notes: Part of Record Mirror’s weekly MIRRORMAIL section.
📰 The Story
⭐ 1. T. Rex on Cilla Black – Louise Quinsell’s Bolan Devotion
Louise Quinsell writes a breathless, emotional defence of Marc Bolan after T. Rex appear on The Cilla Black Show.
She praises:
• Marc’s performance
• Mickey Finn’s congas
• Bill Legend’s drumming
• Steve Currie’s bass rumble
But she attacks Cilla Black for interrupting “Life’s A Gas,” accusing her of ruining the moment and stealing Bolan’s spotlight.
It’s pure glam‑era fandom: dramatic, protective, and deeply personal.
Val Mabbs replies gently, suggesting Louise may be too harsh on Cilla — and even argues that “Life’s A Gas” suited Cilla’s voice.
A perfect snapshot of Bolanmania.
⭐ 2. The Sweet Defended – Patric Breens vs. the Haters
Patric Breens fires back at a previous letter criticising The Sweet.
He challenges the detractor directly:
• Have you seen them live?
• Have you heard their B‑sides?
• Can you prove they’re rubbish?
It’s a passionate defence of a band who, at this exact moment, are No. 1 in the UK with “Blockbuster.”
The Sweet’s fans were famously loyal — and this letter shows why.
⭐ 3. Strawbs vs. Bowie – “Ciggy Barlust” Sparks Outrage
The most iconic letter of the page.
A Bowie superfan is furious that the Strawbs released the B‑side “Backside” under the parody name:
Ciggy Barlust and the Whales from Venus
He accuses the Strawbs of jealousy, insisting Bowie is destined to become “one of the world’s greatest ever performers.”
History proved him right.
This letter has since become a cult artefact of glam‑rock fandom — a moment when Bowie’s followers publicly drew battle lines.
⭐ Secondary Letters (Contextual)
While the glam letters dominate, the page also includes:
• Jimmy Osmond defended passionately
• BBC changes speculated upon
• LP collection bragging
• General pop‑culture commentary
These letters frame the glam pieces within the broader pop landscape of early 1973.
📰 Visual Archive

Glam‑rock letters, MIRRORMAIL, Record Mirror, February 17, 1973.
📰 Related Material
Explore the tags below for connected posts and themes.
📰 Closing Notes
These three letters capture glam rock at its most emotional — a moment when fans fought for their idols with passion, humour, and unfiltered devotion. Together, they form a vivid portrait of 1973’s pop‑cultural heartbeat.
#RecordMirror #MirrorMail #TRex #MarcBolan #TheSweet #DavidBowie #Strawbs #GlamRock #1973 #GlamSlamChronicles
📰 Sources
• Record Mirror, February 17, 1973
• T. Rex, Sweet, and Bowie fan‑culture archives
• UK glam‑rock press history
📝 Copyright Notice
All magazine scans, photographs, and original text excerpts referenced in this entry remain the property of their respective copyright holders. This Chronicle entry is a transformative, non‑commercial archival summary created for historical documentation and educational reference. No ownership of the original material is claimed or implied.





Comments