David Bowie (October 1, 1972) – “Ziggy Stardust And The Spiders From Mars” Review - Detroit Free Press
This sharply critical review from the Detroit Free Press assesses David Bowie's The Rise And Fall Of Ziggy Stardust And The Spiders From Mars. While acknowledging the quality of the musicianship and production, the reviewer questions the album's songwriting and dismisses much of the acclaim that surrounded Bowie during 1972.
Publication: Detroit Free Press
Date: October 1, 1972
Country: United States
Written by John Weisman, the review examines Ziggy Stardust And The Spiders From Mars and immediately argues that the album would not be among the writer's favourite releases of the year. While recognising Bowie's use of sound and the tightness of the band, Weisman remains unconvinced by the record as a whole.
The reviewer praises the musicianship of Mick Woodmansey, Mick Ronson and Trevor Bolder, noting the strength of the group's performance throughout the album. Bowie's production standards are also acknowledged, with comparisons made to contemporary artists including Marc Bolan and Todd Rundgren.
However, the article argues that the album's main weakness lies in its lyrics. Weisman describes many of the songs as immature and overly theatrical, suggesting that Bowie places too much emphasis on the Ziggy Stardust concept. The reviewer believes the "stardust" theme has already become repetitive and criticises what is seen as excessive promotion surrounding the release.
Songs including "Starman", "Moonage Daydream" and "Star" are cited as examples of the album's recurring themes. The review also suggests that Bowie occasionally sounds like a more aggressive version of T. Rex, despite the quality of the backing musicians.
One positive observation is reserved for "Suffragette City", which the writer identifies as a strong rock-and-roll track. Nevertheless, the review concludes on a negative note, arguing that publicity and promotion cannot compensate for what the reviewer views as mediocre songwriting.
A large accompanying photograph of David Bowie occupies the majority of the page and is accompanied by the caption: "David Bowie: At last 'Ziggy,' but all the promotion and tender care in the world cannot make Bowie any better a writer than he is — mediocre."
CONTEXT AND NOTES
Published during the rise of Ziggy Stardust, the review provides an example of the divided critical reaction Bowie could still receive in 1972. While many publications were embracing his work, others remained sceptical about both the concept and the growing publicity surrounding him.
The article is particularly notable because it contrasts respect for the musicianship and production with criticism of the songwriting. With hindsight, the review stands as an example of how even albums later regarded as classics could initially provoke highly mixed responses.
FEATURE HIGHLIGHTS
Event: Review of The Rise And Fall Of Ziggy Stardust And The Spiders From Mars
Era: 1972 Ziggy Stardust era
Tone: Critical and sceptical
Photography: Large full-length photograph of David Bowie accompanying the review
WHAT THE CLIPPING SHOWS
• Critical review of The Rise And Fall Of Ziggy Stardust And The Spiders From Mars
• Praise for the playing of Mick Ronson, Mick Woodmansey and Trevor Bolder
• Positive mention of "Suffragette City"
• Criticism of Bowie's songwriting and the Ziggy Stardust concept
All magazine scans, photographs, and original text excerpts referenced in this entry remain the property of their respective copyright holders.
This Chronicle entry is a transformative, non-commercial archival summary created for historical documentation and educational reference.
No ownership of the original material is claimed or implied.
Comments